With the tight mayoral runoff election coming up this April
in Chicago between Mayor Rahm Emanuel and challenger, Jesús G. Garcia, much of
the opposition seems to be coming from a challenge to educational policy decisions
that were made by the city’s current administration. (New York Times, March 3, 2015)
From their website:
The report, “Should Chicago Have an Elected Representative School Board? A New Review of the Evidence,” assesses the agenda and major policies of Chicago’s current Board and how their decisions have negatively impacted Chicago Public Schools students. The research found no conclusive evidence suggesting mayor-appointed boards are more effective at governing schools, inequities in schooling have increased under the leadership of the current Board, its major policies including school closures have failed to improve schools, and the unelected Board is largely unresponsive to the complaints and suggestions of parents and community leaders.
To read the entire report published at the University of
Illinois at Chicago, go to:
http://ceje.uic.edu/publications/The way that many parents defined academic quality was different than the official markers of quality represented by the district’s performance policy rating system. For example, many families defined academic quality as having after-school programs, certain curricula and courses, small class sizes, positive and welcoming school environments, and/or one-on-one attention from teachers in classes. Although some families did talk about their school’s official policy rating, most factored in these other "unofficial" indicators of academic quality when making their school choice decisions.
Readers can find that report at: https://ccsr.uchicago.edu/publications/school-closings-chicago-understanding-families-choices-and-constraints-new-school
Hi Dear, have you been certainly visiting this site daily, if that's the case you then will certainly get good knowledge.yalewriter.com
ReplyDelete